The Nobel Peace Prize and the Paradox of War Criminals: A Critique of Moral Hypocrisy

By Dito Impolverato

The Nobel Peace Prize, ostensibly created to honor those who advance global harmony, has repeatedly been awarded to individuals implicated in war crimes, revealing a profound contradiction in the so-called "civilized" world's moral framework. Figures like Henry Kissinger, who orchestrated the brutal bombing campaigns in Cambodia and Vietnam, were grotesquely celebrated with the prize, despite their legacies of mass death and suffering. This hypocrisy underscores how the prize functions as a tool of bourgeois legitimacy, laundering the reputations of perpetrators under the guise of peace. The case of Kissinger is not an anomaly but a pattern where imperial powers reward their own while condemning others for lesser crimes.

I am a Nobel prize winner painter, in the past, I painted with pure colors, Right now, I paint with nude words on white paper

Botrehan

I took it as a daily personal challenge to make just one perfect artwork about something I saw in my imagination mirror in a fleeting moment in a dream somewhere.

The suggestion that a criminal war, such as that waged by the Israeli leadership amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza, could nominate someone for the Nobel Peace Prize is not only absurd but also a grotesque travesty of justice. Israel's so-called "peace" is based on the systematic annihilation of Palestinians: starvation campaigns, targeted killings of civilians, and the destruction of entire neighborhoods under the pretext of security. 56 The idea that such a regime can be honored for "peace" while actively engaging in ethnic cleansing exposes the Nobel Committee's complicity in whitewashing state terrorism. The prize, rather than a symbol of moral authority, becomes a propaganda tool for oppressive powers.

The abstraction of this situation lies in the West’s selective memory of history. After World War II, the Nuremberg Trials were meant to establish that aggression and crimes against humanity would never again go unpunished. Yet, today, the same powers that condemned Nazi racism and supremacism actively enable Israel’s apartheid and extermination campaign in Gaza. The moral high ground claimed by the "civilized world" collapses when its institutions reward those who replicate the very atrocities they once prosecuted. The Nobel Peace Prize, in this context, is not a recognition of virtue but a shield for impunity.

During the 12-day war between Israel and Iran in June 2025, Israel intensified its slaughter in Gaza, even as global attention momentarily shifted. Reports documented Israeli forces deliberately targeting Palestinians searching for food in so-called "safe zones," turning survival into a death sentence. This cruelty starving a besieged population while bombing them fits the legal definition of genocide, yet the architects of this horror remain shielded by Western diplomacy. The Nobel Prize, if awarded to such figures, would not just be a moral failure but an active endorsement of extermination

The deeper question is whether the Nobel Peace Prize has ever truly represented peace, or if it has always been a political instrument. From Barack Obama, who bombed seven countries after receiving the prize, to the European Union, a major arms dealer lauded for "reconciliation," the award has consistently served power rather than justice. If a Palestinian child bleeding under rubble could vote, would they consider their killers "peacemakers"? The answer is obvious, yet the world’s elite continue to pretend otherwise, revealing the prize as a hollow ritual of self-congratulation.

The solution is not reform but resistance rejecting the legitimacy of institutions that sanctify war criminals. The Nuremberg Principles declared that "following orders" is no defense for atrocity, yet today’s war criminals are celebrated with prizes rather than prosecuted. Until the international community holds perpetrators accountable, the Nobel Peace Prize will remain a sick joke, a gold-plated stamp on the foreheads of butchers. The Palestinian people, like the victims of Kissinger’s bombings or the survivors of Bosnia’s ethnic cleansing, deserve justice—not the farce of their oppressors being honored for "peace."

In the end, the Nobel Peace Prize reflects not the triumph of morality but the tyranny of power. If history judges us, it will not remember the prize winners but the unbroken spirit of those who resisted them. The true peacemakers are not the statesmen with blood on their hands, but the oppressed who, even in the face of annihilation, refuse to surrender their humanity. That is a prize no committee can award and no criminal can ever take away.

Why Independent Artists Shouldn't Sign with Labels and Embrace the Open Internet

By Dito Impolverato

The traditional music industry, dominated by major record labels, is a system that has historically exploited artists, especially independent ones. Abusive contracts, copyrights held for decades, and unfair profit distribution are just some of the problems. While Gilberto Gil celebrated the recovery of the rights to his work, many musicians, like Cartola, died in poverty, with their creations controlled by third parties. This system doesn't protect artists, but rather the intermediaries who profit from their work.

PRAXIS POINTS

by Psymbol

You can right click save this NFT and it is good praxis to do so, and share it, and you can reuse it for whatever even sell some shirts, idgaf, anyways it'll be under a cc0 license and the design itself uses cc0 assets, so go for it. This piece was created as satire and for entirely satirical and comedic purposes.

The open internet and technologies like NFTs and IPFS offer a truly liberating alternative. NFTs are self-executing contracts that allow the direct transfer of value between artist and fan, without intermediaries. By licensing works under CC0 (voluntary public domain), artists escape the industry of artificial shine, where success is measured by likes and views manipulated by algorithms and paid boosts. Creative autonomy is worth more than the validation of an engagement machine.

Record labels operate under a model that prioritizes quick profits, often at the expense of artistic integrity. They control not only music rights but also the narrative surrounding artists, shaping their audiences through massive marketing campaigns. Meanwhile, centralized digital platforms like Spotify and YouTube don't guarantee real audiences—bots and fake user farms distort the reality of what's heard. Decentralization breaks this monopoly.

A small but engaged community is infinitely more valuable than millions of empty streams. Independent artists who build direct relationships with their audiences have more control over their careers and livelihoods. Decentralized platforms, such as those based on IPFS, allow for self-custody of works, preventing third parties from hijacking or monetizing them without consent. True independence lies in owning the means of production and distribution.

The current generation of artists no longer needs to rely on manipulable reward systems. Music can circulate freely, with fair monetization via smart contracts and cryptocurrencies. While record labels insist on contracts that lock artists in for years, Web3 offers flexibility and transparency. Those who produce art should be the primary beneficiaries, not executives sitting in an office.

Artistic resistance requires decentralization. Sharing intellectual property, allowing remixes, opening access, and still guaranteeing remuneration are real possibilities today. Cartola, if he were alive, might have chosen this path rather than seeing his work imprisoned. The fight is not just for copyright, but for a new model in which art is not held hostage by anyone.

Independent artists must look to the future without fear: the open internet is the stage, the tools are available, and the power is in the hands of those who create it. The era of record labels as gatekeepers is over. Now is the time to build a new history one where music truly belongs to those who make it and those who love it.

BRICS, Debt Dominance, and the Collapse of American Hegemony

By Dito Impolverato

The era of dollar dominance is crumbling under the weight of its own contradictions. Propped up by a pyramid of trillion-dollar debt and credit deficits, the American economy now resembles a hollow shell, where financial liquidity is a mirage controlled by the Federal Reserve and the Wall Street elite. The once-unshakable global hegemony of the dollar is being challenged by the relentless rise of the BRICS alliance, which continues to expand its membership and innovate alternatives to dollar-denominated trade. With the accession of new partners such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Indonesia to the bloc, BRICS is poised to dismantle the financial architecture that has enslaved emerging economies to American whims.

BRICS

by Nino Arteiro

A new mode has been activated

Meanwhile, the American banking system operates under a dangerous illusion: its coffers are empty of gold, replaced by digital inflows and speculative derivatives. The Federal Reserve's monetary policy serves not the people, but the interests of Fortune 500 companies, perpetuating a cycle of inflation and inequality. This false liquidity—a numbers game manipulated by central bankers—has left the American working class abandoned, with veterans of imperial wars now swelling the ranks of the homeless. These forgotten soldiers, abandoned by the very state that sent them to fight, are waking up to the harsh reality: the arms industry enriches cartels and arms dealers, while draining trillions from public coffers that could finance healthcare, education, and housing.

The American empire, desperate to maintain control, has begun to undermine sovereign nations through economic sabotage and regime change operations. Brazil, under Lula's leadership, has become a prime target. Recent attempts to cover up the crimes of Bolsonaro—watch thief, mastermind of corruption, and facilitator of fascism—reveal Washington's fear of losing control over Latin America. But the Brazilian people, regaining their sovereignty, have resisted. The threat, however, persists, and the Global South must unite under the BRICS and regional alliances to forge a new financial order free from dollar dependence.

The mathematics of dollar supremacy are a fraud. Its collapse is inevitable, and the world is already seeking alternatives. From yuan-backed oil deals to the BRICS' push for a common trading currency, change is underway. Latin America, long exploited by American imperialism, must join this movement—not as a subordinate, but as an architect of a more just system.

The end of the dollar's reign will not come peacefully. The American elite will fight to preserve its privileges, but the tide cannot be stopped. As veterans rot in the streets and workers are crushed by austerity, the truth becomes undeniable: the dollar is dead. It simply doesn't know it yet. The future belongs to those who dare to build it—and the BRICS, alongside a liberated Global South, are leading the way.

Major Cyber ​​Heist Targets Central Bank of Brazil: US$1 Billion Stolen and Laundered Through Cryptocurrencies

By Dito Impolverato

In one of the largest cyberattacks in Brazil's financial history, hackers stole approximately R$1 billion (US$140 million) from checking accounts linked to the Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) through a breach at C&M Software, a major banking services provider. The attack, which occurred on June 30, 2025, exploited stolen employee credentials to simulate fraudulent transactions, targeting eight financial institutions, including BMP Money Plus and Credsystem. Although the BCB confirmed the incident, the exact amount remains under investigation, with estimates ranging from R$400 million to R$1 billion.

Hacker

by tz1hdxPn1DvxSc5kwvRZRZ63g1mYKK1Sc5X2

Minted Sep 16, 2021

The hackers demonstrated deep knowledge of Brazil's payment systems, specifically targeting checking accounts used for interbank settlements via Pix, the country's instant payments platform. Posing as legitimate institutions, they bypassed multi-factor authentication and transferred funds to more than 40 shell accounts before converting some of them into cryptocurrency. Notably, Bitcoin (BTC), Tether (USDT), and Ether (ETH) were used to launder the stolen funds, with exchanges and over-the-counter (OTC) desks reporting suspicious spikes in USDT and BTC purchases during the attack.

Authorities traced $30–40 million of the stolen funds to cryptocurrency transactions, blocked in part by platforms such as SmartPay, which detected anomalous activity at 12:18 AM on June 30. CEO Rocelo Lopes flagged irregular Pix-to-crypto conversions and froze the transactions, preventing further losses. However, blockchain analysts suggest that the criminals may have transferred the remaining funds to privacy-focused coins, such as Monero (XMR), to avoid being tracked.

The BCB's response included disconnecting C&M Software from its systems and suspending three fintechs (Transfeera, Nuoro Pay, and Soffy) linked to the money laundering scheme. Meanwhile, São Paulo police arrested João Nazareno Roque, a C&M employee who confessed to selling his credentials for R$15,000 (~US$2,700) and developing internal tools to facilitate the theft. Investigators recovered R$270 million of the stolen funds but acknowledge that the majority remains unrecovered.

This attack highlights vulnerabilities in banking-as-a-service (BaaS) providers, where third-party APIs and shared infrastructure create systemic risks. Critics argue that the BCB's real-time monitoring failed to flag irregular transactions, such as access outside of business hours and atypical transfer volumes. C&M, now under partial operational restrictions, has promised to strengthen security protocols, including stricter API governance and customer credential requirements.

The incident has sparked calls for reforms in cryptocurrency regulation, especially for exchanges integrated with Pix. While blockchain transparency aids recovery efforts, the ease of converting stolen funds into cryptocurrency highlights gaps in compliance. The BCB and the Federal Police continue to investigate, focusing on identifying the international syndicate behind the attack.

As Brazil grapples with the aftermath, the heist establishes a grim record—surpassing the 2005 Fortaleza bank robbery (R$164 million)—and raises urgent questions about cybersecurity in emerging payment ecosystems. With losses still unquantified and cryptocurrency trails fading, the case could redefine how financial institutions protect themselves against AI-assisted cybercrimes and insider threats.